> able to do something that desktop publishers need to do every day. > The largest usability issues with an application like Scribus are not being > Maybe complicated tools need complicated ui's.Ĭomplicated and usable are not necessarily mutually exclusive. After that is done, put pretty icons everywhere. Make a tool that people can use for their jobs. I would rather the developers spend the time finishing the necessary feature todos. The icon themes and menu structures are frankly secondary. That is what would prevent people from using it. The largest usability issues with an application like Scribus are not being able to do something that desktop publishers need to do every day. And I wouldn't have them any other way because they are very effective for their purpose. I use tools that require weeks of training to use effectively. I don't want to say what I would call someone who complains about it for those reasons. KDevelop has a complicated menu structure, buttons all over, and usually shows this wierd stuff in languages that most don't understand. #SCRIBUS 1.6 PROFESSIONAL#It's professional people generating stuff, usually on short notice, for printing. Maybe complicated tools need complicated ui's.ĭesktop publishing isn't something granny sits down at. #SCRIBUS 1.6 SOFTWARE#It's not a compelling feature for Scribus at all, and should, at best be glossed over in a sentence like "Scribus has all the features you'd expect from Pagemaker, like.", not given its own paragraph and screenshots.ĭid the contact sheets look ok? Did you take any samples to a professional printer? Were there problems with color matching or calibration? This software should have been put into the hands of a professional graphic designer to review, not a self-professed open source enthusiast. It's things like that, that help to make Scribus a good program.Īligning columns and objects are things that were present in Adobe products when I was using Apple system 8 and Pagemaker back in the nineties. Therefore saving me the time and hassle of having to do that myself. So all I do in Scribus is I select all three text boxes, select the Distribute/align function and the boxes are aligned. #SCRIBUS 1.6 PDF#* Font embedding and sub-setting in both postscript and PDF export Well, so what? If he made his living as a layout designer or editor or, well, anything vaguely print-related, this review would carry some weight.Īs it is, he doesn't spend enough time with the core professional features of Scribus that he starts his article with : Look at the author info at the end of the article - he's a student and an open-source enthusiast. period.īut he's not a customer, not really. #SCRIBUS 1.6 PC#If you have to deal with lots of pixels or vector graphics, you need a fast PC and lots of RAM. But that's not a real minus, cause even scribus can't do magic. An old PIII is really not enough to do serious work with scribus. If you've more than one page the selection and view sometimes jumps around until you loose orientation on the pageī) the story editor (text input in general)Īnd Scribus has nearly the same demands on hardware like other comparable layout tools (Quark, etc.). I'm using it quite frequently for layout of sales brochures) and in my opinion the weak points of scribus are:Ī) zoom and selection tools. This just did not make sense for me (and btw., I am a scribus user. I can agree on improving the usability (who doesn't.) and standards-compliance (like putting the print preview under the file menu). I don't see the point in picking the alignment feature as an outstanding nicety (where there are actually far more impressive features) versus "bad usability" as a major drawback. I overlooked the last paragraph with the score.Īnyway, I'm a bit surprised, that the reviewer gave Scribus a fairly good score, but the review doesn't sound like he/she is impressed by the app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |